Why Studios Are Afraid to Put Two Stars in One Awards Category

Julia Roberts Jake Gyllenhaal Supporting Actors

“Blurred Lines” is the song of the year — and it could also be the theme song for this year’s supporting races.

Julia Roberts, Barkhad Abdi, Josh Brolin, Daniel Bruhl, Steve Coogan, Will Forte and Jake Gyllenhaal are being proposed in the supporting category. Each could be considered a lead, due to their time onscreen, but there is a logic in calling them supporting: All portray characters who are reacting off of individuals who are at the center of the plot: Meryl Streep, Tom Hanks, Kate Winslet, Chris Hemsworth, Judi Dench, Bruce Dern and Hugh Jackman, respectively.

But the supporting definition is partly strategic: Roberts (“August: Osage County”), Abdi (“Captain Phillips”), Bruhl (“Rush”), Forte (“Nebraska”) and Gyllenhaal (“Prisoners”) are all in films where another performer is being touted in the lead category, and studios believe (wrongly) that two noms in one category will cancel each other out.

Abdi, Brolin, Bruehl, Coogan, Forte and Gyllenhaal: That’s six actors right there, more than enough to fill all the supporting slots. But they have tough competition, including George Clooney (a small but crucial role in “Gravity”), Michael Fassbender (“12 Years a Slave”), Chris Cooper (“Osage”), Colin Farrell (“Saving Mr. Banks”), Harrison Ford (“42”), James Gandolfini (“Enough Said”), John Goodman (“Inside Llewyn Davis”), Tom Hanks (“Saving Mr. Banks”), Jared Leto (“Dallas Buyers Club”), Matthew McConaughey (“Mud”), David Oyeloto (“The Butler”) and Geoffrey Rush (“The Book Thief”). At this point, all are considered viable contenders. And there are also dark horses, including  James Franco (“Spring Breakers”) and Dermot Mulroney (“Osage”).

Aside from Roberts, supporting actress ranks include Jennifer Garner (“Dallas Buyers Club”), Naomie Harris (“Mandela”), Melissa Leo (“Prisoners”), Margo Martindale (also “Osage”), Carey Mulligan (“Inside Llewyn Davis”), Lupita Nyong’o (“12 Years”), Octavia Spencer (“Fruitvale Station”), June Squibb (“Nebraska”) and Alfre Woodard (“12 Years”; like Clooney, making maximum impact with minimal onscreen time).

Nearly all of these films are worth considering in the SAG Ensemble category. But in some cases, the ensemble work is so strong, it’s hard to single out a few; those films include “Blue Jasmine” (Sally Hawkins, Andrew Dice Clay); “Lone Survivor” (all are good, but maybe Ben Foster); “The Butler” (Oprah Winfrey) and “Kill Your Darlings” (Dane DeHaan, Michael C. Hall).

And when talking about supporting, there is one key question: Scarlett Johansson. In the past, actors branches have declined to nominate someone who’s heard but not seen. Shouldn’t actors know better? In many ways, it’s harder to create a full character without body language. Johansson is a key to the success of that film, and “Her” wouldn’t work without her.

There are also films that we haven’t seen yet: “American Hustle,” “The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug,” “The Invisible Woman,” “Out of the Furnace” and “The Wolf of Wall Street.” (Buzz is building for Jonah Hill in “Wolf,” based on the trailer. In the kudos world, that’s how things sometimes work.)

Often Oscar strategists assume that two actors in the same category will cancel each other out. But recently Octavia Spencer in “The Help” and Melissa Leo in “The Fighter” won, even though another actress from the same film was also nommed. Still, old myths have a way of lingering.

And sometimes voters have their own definition of “supporting.” Kate Winslet in “The Reader” won a SAG Award for supporting, an Oscar for lead. Christoph Waltz in “Django Unchained” last year: Lead? Probably, but Oscar voters rewarded him for supporting.

Blurred lines indeed.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 6

Leave a Reply

6 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. JJ says:

    Garner in Dallas Buyers Club? I don’t think so.

  2. Michael says:

    Well it’s like TRAINING DAY. The film was about Ethan Hawke, it was his story, it opened and closed with him, and he was in almost every single scene. Yet he was nominated as a supporting and Denzel was nominated as a lead because they assumed they had better chances there based on performance rather than what was technically correct.

  3. Dean says:

    Johansson isn’t getting nominated. Why are people still talking about it? She gave half a performance. It’s not fair.

    • ashley says:

      Why not? She was brilliant in Her.

      • GRubi says:

        I’m not saying I disagree with you Dean, but the argument is that because she is “giving half a performance” as you say, she is even more deserving because she’s able to evoke emotion and feeling from the audience despite the fact that we don’t even see her. I’d say that’s a pretty good argument.

        But yeah, you’re right. There’s no way she’s getting nominated.

      • Dean says:

        …..it’s half a performance. It wouldn’t be fair as you’re not seeing physical emotion. If she gets a nom, there is something really fishy there. Andy Serkis was widely talked about and got snubbed. He in my mind was fairly in consideration as you’re seeing the physical emotion as well as the vocal. Johansson’s voice is just there. It’s only half a performance, that’s why she isn’t getting nominated.

More Film News from Variety

Loading