Top Wall Street Analyst: Pay TV “Cord-Cutting Is Real”

Digital Cord Cutting

Moffett estimates U.S. pay-TV ex-subs have reached 1.9 million

No one on the planet may know more about the pay-TV business than Craig Moffett, who analyzed it consistently and cogently for about a decade at Bernstein Research up until the end of last year. He resurfaced last month at his own research firm, Moffett Research, and returned Monday to the subject he knows so well with a simple message that stood out from the rest of a 135-page coverage initiation document: “cord-cutting is real.”

While that’s far from a 180-degree flip to anyone who has followed how his opinions regarding the complexities of pay-TV subscription rates have evolved since he called the trend an “urban myth” in 2009, it was clearly his most forceful declaration confirming the existence of cord-cutting.

Citing the largest year-over-year pay-TV subscriber slide yet that occurred in the first quarter of the year, Moffett didn’t mince words: “Pay TV is unmistakably declining and the rate of penetration decline is accelerating. The very fact that there have recently been more new households being minted each year than there have been new pay-TV households is proof positive that cord cutting is real.”

While making abundantly clear that this cord-cutting evidence didn’t mean “seismic changes” were just around the corner for the industry, Moffett projected that the pay-TV penetration rate would sink from 87.9% this year to 82% by 2020. He characterized the cost-cutting population as being 1.9 million strong — though that’s a drop in the bucket against a pay-TV populace totaling over 100 million in the U.S.

Moffett sees a combination of two factors driving the acceleration of subscriber decline: 1) the lower-income households that he believes comprises the biggest part of the cord-cutting segment are getting priced out of the market by increasing subscription rates 2) the digital alternatives from Netflix to Hulu that are meant to be supplements to the pay-TV market end up being substitutes in the aggregate.

It’s an interesting evolution for a prominent analyst who built a reputation as something of a skeptic on the cord-cutting front. But by no means is he flip-flopping: Moffettologists will note a creeping credence he lent to a trend he once pooh-poohed in his comments over the years. As early as 2011, he acknowledged, albeit parenthetically, that change was a-coming: “Notwithstanding an ongoing fascination with the notion of cord-cutting (in favor of web vide0), there is little evidence that this is a significant phenomenon (yet).”

SEE ALSO: Cord-Cutting: At Last, Hard Evidence It’s Really Happening

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 4

Leave a Reply

4 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Michael says:

    Moffett has been the most significant name on Wall Street propping up the cable operators and networks while talking down the power of online video. And now he’s admitting that cord-cutting is real. Priceless.

  2. Tiara says:

    I’m sure there are better pictures that you could use for these cord-cutting stories…

  3. Moffettologist-no-longer-with-subscription says:

    :(

    ‘The Poverty Problem’ was one of my favorite reads.

    I think it’s interesting that cord-cutting is driven by low-price-point alternatives and can pose a threat to the low-end, yet much of the value of the current crop of service focuses on delivering to the higher income brackets.

    I.e. Dish Hopper, Netflix, Amazon, Aereo more-or-less require the $500 tablet and $100/month wireless data plan to fully take advantage of the TV-everywhere services. If you just have a computer, you’re only getting a subset.

  4. justice forall says:

    maybe the government should start subsidizing TV like the Obama phones!!! for lower income people

More Digital News from Variety

Loading