Nielsen Offers Focus on ‘Zero-TV’ Homes

Nielsen Offers Focus on 'Zero-TV' Homes

Network execs have lately been quick to chide Nielsen as an old dog that can’t seem to learn new, more digitally savvy tricks, citing a ratings system that does not account for online numbers that can help drive viewership for a show.

But the org’s cross-platform report this month is a step in a more digital direction, with an emphasis on what Nielsen calls “zero-TV” households.

Surprisingly, being a zero-TV household doesn’t mean its residents don’t own actual television — 75% of the zero-TV homes have at least one TV set, but get their entertainment content through other services and devices that Nielsen doesn’t traditionally track. Almost half of them watch TV content through subscription services like Hulu or Netflix, and the Zero-TV demos tend to skew younger.

Zero-TV households account for less than 5% of American homes, but their numbers have more than doubled since 2007, when around 2 million homes qualified as zero-TV households, to over 5 million.

“These households did not fit Nielsen’s traditional definition of a TV household and will start to be included in our measured samples for the coming 2013-2014 season,” senior veep of insights Dounia Turril said in the report.

Why are these viewers maintaining a zero-TV lifestyle? 36% cite cost and 31% cite lack of interest as their reasons for dodging traditional TV services.

L+7 numbers have become increasingly leveraged by nets plagued by tepid live broadcast ratings, and now a call for a better standard in digital ratings can be heard from younger-skewing nets like the CW, whose digital aud base is not accounted for in traditional numbers.

An acknowledgment of the zero-TV household evolution and basic data on their numbers may not be enough to satisfy some net execs, though, who have already soured on certain Nielsen standards when it comes to analyzing a program’s success.

What’s more, zero-TV households do not include homes where traditional TV service is available, but residents tend towards digital content consumption. So long as Nielsen remains reactive to consumer trends, the ratings lag will continue — and so will the industry’s complaints.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. The negligence, irresponsibility and predatory greed which colors the social engineering directed against the audiences of these “broadcasters,” should be more than enough to qualify them for demise (if not a good flogging). Their position demanded/demands the constructive application of their influence. But what do we get, instead? A nation of stupid Merikins milk cows.

    Hopefully, breaking their monopoly on both content and its delivery, will give some a fighting chance at recovery.

    Fran Lebowitz once said, “In the Soviet Union, capitalism triumphed over communism. In this country, capitalism triumphed over democracy.”

    How true – now that the plantation hands are too incompetent to practice it responsibly.

  2. BW says:

    You begin by explaining that “Zero-TV” means having and watching TV, and then you repeat the phrase throughout to legitimize it? Call it what it is, zero cable/satellite. Why try to force one more cognitive dissonance on your readership?

  3. EK says:

    Nielsen needs to find a way to report BOTH network and cable/PBS etc. simultaneously to stay relevant. Thus yesterday’s (Sunday) evening Nielsen numbers didn’t factor in big cable shows like THE BIBLE. Only Variety had the sense to reference the existence of off-web broadcasts when reporting last night’s ratings. But those off-net numbers will not be available until tomorrow so it will be a Chinese menu of one from column A and one from column B when trying to piece together a true picture of Sunday evening. Variety will do this … the others will only report the cable numbers as though the previous day’s Nielsen numbers exist in their own pristine vacuum. Stupid, and the upfronts, which are now starting, will doubtless reflect the imperfection of the situation as advertisers are asked to shell out big bucks for programming with faulty numerical propaganda on the table.

More Digital News from Variety

Loading