House Lawmaker Mounts New Push for Radio Performance Right

Mel Watt
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Rep. Mel Watt to introduce legislation to make stations compensate artists

Musicians and broadcasters are poised to engage in a new round of a decades-long lobbying battle over whether artists should be paid when their songs are played on broadcast radio stations.

On Thursday, Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.), ranking member of the House Judiciary’s Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition and the Internet, said that he plans to introduce legislation soon to give musicians and recording artists a performance right, forcing stations to negotiate with them for the right to play their songs over the air. Watt and other lawmakers pushed legislation four years ago to establish such a performance right, and although it passed the House and Senate judiciary committees, it stalled out in the face of opposition from broadcasters.

“We have been talking about this for a while, but it is time for us to act on it,” Watt said.

Such a scenario appears to be the case again, as the National Assn. of Broadcasters was quick to issue a statement in opposition shortly after Watt announced his intention at a House Judiciary hearing on copyright reform.

Dennis Wharton, spokesman for NAB, called the proposal a “performance tax” “that would kill jobs at America’s hometown radio stations while diverting millions of dollars to offshore record labels.”

Watt indicated that his legislation would differ from previous efforts in that it would not set up a royalty structure, but merely recognize a performance right for sound recordings. “This will incentivize the parties to negotiate in good faith,” he said. He said he plans to introduce the bill before Congress goes on its summer recess, expected after the end of next week.

Supporters of a performance right say that it would remove an inequity in copyright law, given that songwriters receive compensation when their works are played over the air while the performers are not compensated. There is a performance right for artists when their works are played on digital platforms and satellite radio, established under separate legislation.

Ted Kalo, executive director of the musicFIRST Coalition, an org of labels and musicians that has been pushing for the performance right, said that “AM/FM radio stands alone among all forms of radio in refusing to pay music creators for airing their performances.” He said that while other countries recognize the performance right, foreign royalties cannot be collected because it is not recognized in the U.S.

There are questions about whether Watt can find co-sponsors on the other side of the aisle to help the bill advance in the House, and what will happen if the Senate confirms his nomination to be the next director of the Housing Finance Agency. When such legislation was introduced in 2009, it did gain co-sponsors like Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.).

Broadcasters, however, say that their stations still provide strong promotional platforms for the recording industry, and note that, outside of congressional legislation, Clear Channel has recently struck deals with independent labels to compensate for performances. The broadcasters are pushing for legislation, the Local Radio Freedom Act, which prevents Congress from imposing any “performance fee, tax, royalty or other charge” for playing an artist’s work. It has 143 co-sponsors in the House and 11 in the Senate.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 7

Leave a Reply

7 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Scour says:

    their market share is minuscule. Continue liking obscure things hipster

  2. Scour says:

    Lets call things how they really are. This is NOT local radio station vs. musician. This IS large radio conglomerate vs. large record conglomerate.

    “America’s hometown radio” hahaha… which conglomerate are you referring to?

    And, on the other hand, let’s not act like a performance right for sound recordings is gonna save the world for musicians. The record conglomerates own the masters…

    • Pseudo Hipster says:

      “America’s hometown radio” hahaha… which conglomerate are you referring to?

      College radio, non commercial radio, the few remaining independent non corporate radio stations.

      Please don’t let facts get in the way of you assuming its all Clear Channel and Cumulus. Go on. Continue being an idiot….

      • Pseudo Hipster says:

        Didn’t know NYC was considered podunk…….I guess you learn something new everyday. : 3

      • Georgio says:

        Continue believing the few podunk stations have any ability to influence lawmakers

  3. The time was when artists were thrilled to have a radio station give them airplay. It introduced them, or their new songs to a public that may then go out and purchase. Remember “payola”? I guess what radio stations need to do, since established artists now think that radio play is a privilege for the stations, is only play unheard of bands just trying to make it. I bet those bands would be happy to have free airplay.

    Paying every band would virtually eliminate free radio to listeners, which in turn, would eliminate the pay to the bands. I think stats already prove that fee radio, like Sirius, does not get nearly the listeners that free radio does. Musicians are really cutting their own throats with the attitudes they have now, and they don’t even seem to know it.

    • Pseudo Hipster says:

      What I would like to know is how would this effect the few remaining mom and pops and non commercial/college stations VS companies like Clear Channel and Cumulus.

      Seems like a way to just push out what little competition is left honestly…

More Digital News from Variety

Loading