Third Point Rips Sony Pictures’ Lynton, Pascal Over Film Flops

Hirai criticized for giving execs "free pass" over 'White House Down,' 'After Earth'

Stepping up criticism of Sony Pictures Entertainment, private equity firm Third Point said that Sony leadership was giving “free passes” to chairman and CEO Michael Lynton and co-chairman Amy Pascal, and called into question the studio’s big budget film slate.

In a letter to investors Monday, Third Point says that that they find it “perplexing” that Sony CEO Kazuo Hirai “does not worry about a division that has just released 2013″s versions of ‘Waterworld’ and ‘Ishtar’ back-to-back, instead giving free passes” to Lynton and Pascal, the “executives responsible for these debacles.”

Third Point was referring to a question posed to Hirai at the Allen & Co. Sun Valley conference, when he was asked about the poor performance of “After Earth” and “White House Down” at the box office. “I don’t worry about the entertainment business; it’s doing just fine,” Hirai said, according to Bloomberg News.

“To us, the latest blunders are prima facie evidence of our thesis that Entertainment’s U.S.-based business is being ineffectively overseen and needs its own governance structure led by a board whose job it will be to worry about such troubling results,” Third Point said.

In May, Third Point’s Daniel Loeb delivered a letter to Hirai, calling for a spinoff of as much as 20% of the entertainment division. Although the letter was critical of studio management, it did not refer to them by name. Third Point increased its stake in Sony, and last month had about 70 million shares, or about 6.9%.

A spokesman for Sony said, in a statement, “Sony is focused on creating shareholder value by executing on our plan to revitalize and grow the electronics business, while further strengthening the entertainment and financial service businesses, which generate stable profit. The Sony Board of Directors, as previously noted, is reviewing its proposals. Sony looks forward to continuing a constructive dialogue with our shareholders as we pursue our strategy.”

The studio has reported cost cuts in the past year and has, compared to the TV and electronics divisions, been a bright spot in the Sony empire. Some analysts, accepting the wisdom of spinning off the division, nevertheless express regard for the studio management. The division has expanded its international TV and cable business, and has ramped up its domestic TV production business.

Nevertheless, Third Point said that the entertainment division has a culture that “is characterized by a complete lack of accountability and poor financial controls.” It said that the division “remains poorly managed, with a famously boated corporate structure, generous perk packages , high salaries for underperforming senior executives, and marketing budgets that do not seem to be in line with any sense of return on capital invested.”

Third Point argues that if the entertainment division — which includes music, movies, TV production and cable — “achieved peer margins,” its earnings before the deduction of interest, tax and amortization expenses, or EBITDA, would increase nearly $800 million to just over $2 billion.

While Hirai expressed confidence in the entertainment business at a recent conference in Sun Valley, he also said Sony Corp. would give serious consideration to Loeb’s proposal. The board is expected to meet Wednesday in advance of the company’s earnings call, although insiders don’t anticipate a decision any time soon. Sony Corp. is expected to hold a major strategy meeting in September, according to one individual with knowledge of plans, and an answer on a Sony spinoff could come after that.

Third Point also said it was “concerned” about the 2014 and 2015 film slate, saying that it lacks “lucrative ‘tent pole’ franchises” and that its “pipeline is bleak, despite overspending on numerous projects.”

Third Point did offer praise to Hirai for changes made in the electronics business, by cutting overhead an the number of products offered, They also praised the “perfectly executed introduction” of Playstation 4, and said that the “visible improvement in Sony’s new products has caused us to rethink our approach to valuing Electronics.”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 12

Leave a Reply

12 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. The Kingslayer says:

    Kazuo Hirai is a legend.

  2. harry georgatos says:

    If the executives couldn’t see the moronic screenplays in WHITE HOUSE DOWN and AFTER EARTH then these execs are nothing more then sleazy used-cars salesmen masquerading in the film industry.
    A 15 year old teen would have had better judgement then the frauds at Sony Pictures. A person with a below IQ would have not green lit films such as WHD with a pseudo-actor that has no matinee appeal.
    Anyone who has multiple 200 million dollar mega flops are employees that should see the front door out head first. All the wrong people have all the right jobs.

    • jedi77 says:

      Thank you for the reply. I will consider it when I eventually see it.
      On the face of it, they both looked the same to me. I thoroughly enjoyed OHF, but haven’t gotten around to WHD yet.

      I will say this though. If you are correct, then it would seem the best film made the most money. That is not something I see happening often…

    • jedi77 says:

      How exactly is WHD different from Olympus Has fallen? Are they not equally burdened by a “star” who lacks marquee quality? Do they not both have pretty bad scripts?
      And yet Olympus Has fallen was a hit. I made nearly 100 million in the US.

      Sometimes, just sometimes, it’s hard to gauge a films potential for boxoffice revenue based on the script. Hell, if it was based on the script I would’ve expected Twilight to tank. I would have never greenlit Transformers. But the business is a little more complicated than that. And so are the consumers apparently.

      • harry georgatos says:

        OLYMPUS HAS FALLEN was better developed then the moronic antics of WHD. The humour in WHD borders on the moronic. Antoine Fuqua for me is a better filmmaker then Emmerich. Concepts like TWILIGHT and TRANSFORMERS have built-in teen audience and all that matters is finding the right actors and directors. If I was an executive and someone walked into my office with the script to WHD I’ll chase them out with a sawn-off shotgun. A donkey could have seen that one.

  3. Cylk Cozart says:

    I would love for Mr. Loeb, would consider a division just for filmmakers like me, that have commercial projects that have small budgets, smart production teams and tailored P&A budgets.

    A “real” housekeeping deal.
    Cylk Cozart
    CEO, CozArt Entertainment

  4. Ralcarbo says:

    This guy’s complaints are the reason we have derivative drek at the multi-plexes.

    • jedi77 says:

      Come to think it. The people who watch derivative drek at the cinema are the reason we have drivative drek at the cinema.
      If people would stop watching it, I promise Hollywood would stop making it.

    • jedi77 says:

      Well, he was complaining about After Earth – derivative drek. So he can’t be complaining about it and causing it at the same time.

  5. Who Knows... says:

    Film Studios. Risk it all and get rewarded. Of course the executives are going to get bonuses. They take care of themselves (as well as the “hot” stars, “hot” directors, and “hot” producers). Everyone else be damned.

  6. Kernmandu says:

    These execs may be clueless but this guy critiquing is an accountant — the bane of the film industry.

  7. John Huff says:

    My only question: will these execs get bonuses this year?

More Biz News from Variety

Loading