Top 10 Companies That Pose the Biggest Threat to Pay TV

Google, Apple, Microsoft, Roku Among Pay

Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Aereo, Roku among the ambitious players

Intel may be the ambitious entry in the so-called “over the top” movement aimed at making an end run around the pay-TV business, but it’s far from the only game in town. There’s a wide field of players with no shortage of innovative — but often flawed — strategies. Here’s how they stack up.

(From the pages of the April 2 issue of Variety.)

1. Microsoft

Knock the Redmond realm for being past its prime, but reckon with this reality: XBox is far and away the most well-entrenched OTT solution in living rooms, with an installed base of 76 million users. And they’re not just playing videogames, either, having consumed 18 billion hours of video. There’s fantastic innovation across this platform already in the form of Kinect and Smartglass. The gaming may be a barrier to entry for a broader customer base, but with CBS veteran Nancy Tellem now onboard for a Los Angeles-based studio that will help produce XBox original content, that legacy perception could be further fading.

2. Google

Broadband network? Check (Google Fiber). Set-top? Check (Google TV). Transactional storefront? Check (Google Play). Content? Check (YouTube-funded channels). No company has as many pieces of the puzzle in play. Problem is, none of them are popping yet, but this could grow into a lethal longterm combination of powerful assets.

3. Apple

Yes, the instant Apple settles on a strategy for its long-anticipated but long-delayed “iTV,” this chart becomes meaningless. But until that time, Apple TV remains an underperformer, Airplay via iPad is a stopgap solution and iTunes a la carte orientation will never reach Netflix-like levels of consumption. The devices may one day catch up to the TV, but for now this company is unfulfilled potential. Which makes Apple something of a ghost contender. Boo!

4. Sony

With all the focus on the gizmos that supplement the TV, it’s easy to forget that the TV itself can be its own killer app. If Sony can figure out how to finally improve connected TVs faster than, say, Samsung or LG, there’s an inside track here. And if it doesn’t work, well, there’s still the PS3 console, the cross-platform storefront Unlimited and, unless it gets sold off, a bona fide studio that can create content. No wonder, Sony is considering the same virtual MSO plan as Intel. Cue breath-hold.

See Also: The Big Bet At Intel Corp. That Could Change TV

5. Aereo

Assign each subscriber a mini-antennae and don’t bother with retransmission consent fees: Great concept, but is it legal? When broadcasters failed to get an injunction against this Barry Diller-backed startup last summer, it raised the tantalizing prospect that delivering local TV with DVR capabilities on devices could actually have a shot at more cities, channels and subs. It’s a remote possibility, but until the courts crack down, consider Aereo the sleeper of the field.

6. Amazon

As the transactional go-to for, well, everything online, entertainment is just a small piece of the retail giant’s focus. But there’s an unmistakable push in progress on nailing video content between making subscription streaming a part of its Prime service and a studio of its own developing its first series. Yes, Amazon seems curiously blase about the TV itself beyond app placement, with the focus more on devices like Kindle Fire. In the long term, that could be the right play.

7. Roku

There’s a lot to admire about this scrappy upstart, which has managed to make its purple set-top boxes as popular as Apple TV in the U.S. Certainly News Corp. feels that way, having signed on as an investor. With those boxes shrinking to tiny “sticks” and an authentication pact with Time Warner Cable, there’s hope this platform can innovate its way from supplement to substitute for cable.

8. Netflix

How do 33 million subscribers worldwide and an incredible original content strategy land this streaming service this far down the list? That’s because Netflix has never positioned itself as a cable killer; Reed Hastings has even openly suggested that Netflix should be embedded in multichannel packages. Most of its subscribers already get cable. But if sub growth continues to climb, a company that’s this unpredictable and nimble can always make a paradigm shift that shears the first two letters off its frenemy status. Until then, keep one eye on CEO Hastings.

9. Tivo

The forerunner of the DVR movement has done so much to infiltrate the existing pay-TV world that it’s easy to forget there’s plenty this service has to offer even if you go without pay-TV. Add first-mover advantage and a great interface, and it’s certainly not out of the question there’s some hope that after a rough decade, the next 10 years may be kinder.

10. Boxee

The leader among a bevy of low-cost, fringe-appeal streaming set-tops, Boxee has accomplished an impressive amount in a short time to earn respect among the earliest adopters. But there’s little breakout potential here given how buggy even its diehard fans complain the service is, though the addition of an antennae for local channels is a nifty trick.

The Wild Card: Hulu

No doubt every company listed here with money to burn is going to want to kick the tires on Hulu given indication from sources that parent companies Disney and News Corp. are considering a sale. If Hulu can hold onto its next-day access to primetime TV, it could give any aspiring disrupter a huge leg up in this arms race.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 4

Leave a Reply

4 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Hello, every time i used to check website posts here in the
    early hours in the dawn, for the reason that i love to gain knowledge of more and more.

  2. Richard Lyons says:

    Traditional TV revenues are still growing — though at a small 2% or so per year — at around $70 billion and your list of 10 are after it. . Digital video revenues continue to climb at a double-digit percentage pace, now at $3 billion, with premium video (TV shows and movies, primarily) a hefty piece of the puzzle. It’s safe to say that most TV broadcasters have been disappointed by the returns they have gotten from their forays into digital media. For all the millions of dollars and countless man hours invested, they have managed to create modest side businesses that typically account for only about 4% or 5% of their total revenue…
    The age of the Internet has certainly changed the world of broadcasting! …
    There are ways to aggregate feature film and TV series content to subscription VOD, free and low cost time saving applications, search, news, messaging, content that is smart phone friendly, wow – where did it all come from? Our TV sets are getting smart too, is it really becoming a two or three screen universe or is it all really already just one versatile screen in a variety of sizes? Are you keeping up, staying relevant and addressing your advertisers evolving needs or are you dazed and confused? The numbers tell a sad yet clear story, broadcasters are losing the hearts and minds of youth, they are reinventing how content is consumed and how sponsored branding and messaging is delivered. …
    The New Media industry calls this a natural end-of-growth cycle behavior, the result of fragmentation, exorbitant pricing and a generation gap disconnect. They see you as the dinosaurs, themselves as the emerging mammals. It has been attributed to Darwin that “It is not the strongest species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones most responsive to change.” Old school cozy business relationships grew fat, happy and slept through the changes all around. Advertisers, content providers and audiences see cost cutting, down-sizing, a creeping lack of professionalism, as a sign of acquiescence to the predictions of broadcasting’s decline and fall. …
    Oh sure, TV stations individually are spending money to make better websites, but maybe it’s time to consider really responding and adapting to change…

  3. Eric Post says:

    None of those, except Google Fiber are a legit threat, as long as ISPs use data caps. With data caps you cannot get the kind of service through the Internet.

    • Eric Post, you nailed it, That”s why Comcast should have been added to this list of “players” since they have an opportunity to evolve and offer alacart TV as an option as part of their “triple play” bundle.

      Richard, you also make some great points, I totally agree with your assessment of the current situation.

      BTW, I’ve personally dealt with the folks at Boxee, and I can tell you that they cannot seem to get out of their own way (or ego’s) long enough to be a serious contender in this space.

      In the new world content and bandwidth hold the keys to the kingdom. Those who can bring the two together will win the fight.

More Biz News from Variety

Loading