MGM: Sometimes a Roaring Silence Is Best

Giancarlo Parretti

Studio has had a troubled past, and recovery is hardly assured, but the studio has taken baby steps

Talk to any film producer today and he’ll tell you that it’s easier to raise $200 million for a new project than it is to raise $2 million. Funding for indie films is as problematic today as at any time in Hollywood’s past. In view of this, it may be instructive to flash back to that surreal moment 20 years ago when hundreds of millions of dollars suddenly flooded into the movie business — so much that producers struggled over how to spend it. Perversely, the new funding inspired not a wave of memorable films but rather one of the biz’s more memorable scandals — intrigues ending in massive lawsuits and even jail terms. Before it was over, one of the world’s biggest banks was driven to the edge of bankruptcy and MGM, traditionally the most accident-prone studio, was reduced to the status of an invalid.

(From the pages of the April 9 issue of Variety.)

The source of the money (and the trouble) was Credit Lyonnais, the state-owned French bank which, for reasons of greed and naivete, suddenly decided that filmmaking represented a delicious investment opportunity. Initially, the bank helped fund some edgy films (like the Arnold Schwarzenegger starrer “Total Recall”) but as money-hungry producers started lining up, it became clear that some of the industry’s most notorious crooks were positioned to devour the money.

Front and center was a roly-poly Italian named Giancarlo Parretti (pictured above), an ex-waiter whose principal expertise was Ponzi schemes, not film. Through a series of macho deals, Parretti secured $1.3 billion to acquire MGM, stunning even Hollywood’s most prolific hustlers. To help secure his down payment, Parretti sold MGM’s homevideo assets, which, of course, he did not as yet own.

Sarcastically dubbed “The Oracle From Orvieto,” Parretti cheerfully moved to Beverly Hills, named his daughter as his vice president of finance and brought in an actual lion (not Leo) to enliven his first press conference. Appointing Alan Ladd Jr. as his head of production, Parretti tried to mount a program of pictures, but stars and star filmmakers balked at his offers; they suspected his checks would bounce (many did). One beneficiary of Parretti’s largesse was Michael Ovitz, then chief of CAA, who engineered a $1 million-a-year consulting deal. (Checks to Ovitz didn’t bounce.)

Parretti managed to get a few films going, such as “The Russia House,” starring Sean Connery, but much of the bank’s money went to what were euphemistically called “development deals” involving young women who were neither filmmakers nor developers. Jay Kanter, who worked with Ladd at MGM at the time, recalls that Parretti was both good-humored and opaque. “If you brought up a difficult issue, he would always say, ‘It’s time for a meal,’ and he would start serving food. He never forgot that he had been a waiter.”

After less than a year, the bank started foreclosing on its loans, filing suit against Parretti and even Kirk Kerkorian, charging MGM’s former (and frequent) owner with misrepresenting the studio’s assets. Kerkorian sued back. The executive suites of Credit Lyonnais became a revolving door as France’s Socialist regime tried to limit political fallout.

One former bank executive told me of an emotional moment when he was summoned to a strategy meeting to devise ways to dump the bank’s then-$3 billion loan commitment to the movie business. “I realized that, at that precise moment, that $3 billion of wasted money could have saved the Middle East peace process,” he said. “What were we doing giving the money to Hollywood?”

Ultimately the bank turned its back on the movie business. MGM went through a serious rehabilitation under Frank Mancuso, a thoughtful and responsible executive who then brought in John Calley to revive United Artists. True to form, however, the company would later yet again become embroiled in further financial problems.

Today’s MGM is a corporate anomaly — it’s either primed for a moment of rebirth or sitting in a holding pattern, depending on who you care to believe. With profit participation in “Skyfall” and “The Hobbit,” the company is trying to fund new ventures and regain its longlost status as a major. Skeptics, however, suggest that the new management of MGM, led by Gary Barber, is still saddled with significant debt and that its future role will be limited to cautious co-financing deals.

The famously uncommunicative Barber has maintained his silence on these issues. He’s a shrewd financier from South Africa, and public silence has worked for him in the past. Given MGM’s noisily troubled legacy, it may prove prudent for this moment.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 7

Leave a Reply

7 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. MGM is certainly looking healthier than it has done in decades, congratulations are due to Gary Barber for his sterling work in reviving the company. It’s a little ironic that its recent successes with Skyfall and the Hobbit are both the results of deals originally done by UA many years ago, but it all counts right? Even after many years of corporate maulings and shenanigans, the Lion still stands for something special. The glory days may have gone but the roar of the MGM lion can still send a shiver down the spine. Ars gratis artis, after all…

  2. Why speculate when facts are available? says:

    MGM is neither an “anomaly” nor “saddled with significant debt”. The company is profitable and has very low leverage. MGM makes its financials available to the general public so their financial condition is not a mystery.

    The link to the financials is here:

    http://www.mgm.com/#/about/investor-relations

  3. WZ says:

    So how is this MGM rogue karma any different from when Louis B. Mayer, who after a successful career watch of good old days classic cinema, infamously said on his death bed that ,”Nothing matters”? By the way, Mr. Bart you might wanna investigate why access of your column on this site slows one’s system down to a crawl that I fear may alienate if not lose your cyberspace readership.

  4. JOE S HILL says:

    Metro Goldwyn Mayer has not been a stable studio,as its recent Chapter 11 status has shown-but
    more worse then ever,are its remakes of its classic movies from United Artists and Orion,which really don’t show way too much promise-especially with Sony co-financing their recent movies,,and
    in all the years i have watched MGM’s struggles,i never guessed that it would come to this point!
    i don’t what Gary Barber has in mind,but whatever it is,it better be good,because MGM’s manage
    ment has been really bad,and i have great doubts over this company’s future,because i refuse to call
    MGM a studio,,they tore down their studio in the mid 1980s,shortly after the Ted Turner takeover of
    their movie and TV library,which was the dumbest move to date!-now all their history is owned by Warner Bros. Entertainment,which is even more insulting! my concern now,is what will become of
    United Artists,because they deserve the chance to resume their place in the business,,but MGM has
    other ideas,which are hardly promising,,and dealing with Sony is also very troubling,since they seem
    to be calling the shots! but if i fault MGM for anything in particular,it would still come back to Bad
    management,as well as very Bad decisions,because with what this “company” has gone through,,the
    changes are obvious,since Sony has been backing them-maybe it should be called MGM/Columbia,
    since that’s pretty much what they are,presently,,and that’s down right Pathetic!

  5. MGM has been dead since Kirk bought it in 1969. It should be in the place that Disney or WB are today. This company has ben the victim of the biggest flea market fiasco ever with selling off all it’s assets to make a quick buck here and there.Sony, Quintex, Parretti, Kirk, all the Texas Hedge funds, Sloan, and now Barber is a producer with a huge film library and a slate of rethreads and remakes.

    • Kanjo Bassett says:

      Completely agree, the biggest flea market fiasco in Hollywood history. Kirk and Aubrey killed Metro in 1969. Everything since has been flea market flipping of prime assets for a quick buck: props, Culver City backlots, MGM British Studios, record label, film library, studio headquarters. At this point what’s left to flip?

      • The library is worth something, but the problem is they do not make enough movies nowadays to replentish the library. Their other option is to take 007 and Hobbit profits and buy another few libraries and intergrate them into the MGM main library.

More Biz News from Variety

Loading