‘SNL’ autopsy: What killed Abby Elliott?

Though her name will be included in the list of the latest cast departures at “Saturday Night Live,” there are those who will feel Abby Elliott doesn’t deserve to have her name uttered in the same sentence as Kristen Wiig and Andy Samberg. Abby

As Elliott’s four-year stint on the show unexpectedly ended earlier this week, not even the most generous assessment of her time on “SNL” would put her anywhere near the league of Wiig, Samberg or Jason Sudeikis, another veteran cast member who has yet to be re-signed despite the fact the new season starts next month.

But Elliott’s second-class status is a mystery in more ways than one. Though it’s unclear whether she was cut or just cut out on her own accord, it’s hard to recall an example of an “SNL” cast member who displayed as much talent as she did on the show yet remained woefully underused. Her parting is all the more confusing considering Wiig’s departure may have provided just the opportunity for her to finally make good on her potential. 

It’s easy to underestimate just how great a season Elliott had in 2011-12. Despite the fact she was among the least-used cast members in “SNL’s” 37th season, according to this handy pie chart by Splitsider, which broke the story of her departure, she came into her own with consistently brilliant impersonations. Her two outings as Zooey Deschanel were among the highlights of the season, as was her Meryl Streep and Rosie Pope. That’s not even counting her reliable work as Khloe Kardashian, Rachel Maddow and Angelina Jolie. 

It always seemed like there was a determination made early in Elliott’s tenure that she was best consumed in small doses. Yet it’s not entirely clear why considering she so effectively made the most of her limited opportunIties. So what went wrong for Elliott on “SNL?”

“SNL” seemed quick to pigeonhole her as an impersonation specialist. That’s fine if you’re Jay Pharoah, who has shown he’s brilliant in that department–but only in that department. Elliott seemed to have broader range but lacked the opportunity to exercise it. She didn’t get a single memorable original character off the ground but you have to wonder whether she ever really got the chance.

What probably held back Elliott even more so was that her “SNL” career had the misfortune of coinciding with the tail end of Wiig’s reign as comedy queen. She was overused and overshadowed both Elliott and Nasim Pedrad in the process. As admirable as “SNL’s” evolution has been in recent years as a female-led troupe in the boys’ club that is comedy, Lorne Michaels has always run the tires off his leading ladies, going back to Tina Fey and Amy Poehler.

Elliott may also have sensed competition coming from the newer women. Vanessa Bayer seemed to have leapfrogged her in the pecking order and Kate McKinnon displayed enough early promise to follow suit. With Wiig out of the way, it seemed like there was at least a chance for Elliott to battle Bayer for the honor of being “SNL’s” reigning queen.

If it’s any consolation to Elliott, history is filled with comedians who didn’t let lackluster stints at “SNL” stop them from going on to become stars. As Chris Rock, Sarah Silverman and Tracy Morgan discovered, better things awaited them once they were done with the show. Even Elliott’s own father, Chris Elliott, did well for himself before and after his one woeful season on “SNL.”

At just 25 years old, Elliott has got plenty of time left to prove herself. Whatever she does next should prove a better fit for her career. 

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. The genial Seth Meyers has had a lot of his old SNL companions over on Late Night, but not her.

  2. Vincent I. says:

    I’ve been an avid watcher of SNL since the 70’s. Love the show, and like to see how these comics springboard this platform for there own future . I recently started watching the reruns on Comedy Central , the time slots at 10 & 11 am.
    Out of nowhere , one day I noticed Abbey Elliot , and how natural her talent was. I became immediately addicted to watching for any sketch that she was in. There was a skit that Kristen Wigg, Charlize Theron, and Abbey Elliot where performing . In my opinion Wigg, & Theron couldn’t even shine Abbeys shoes . No disrespect to those great and beautiful actresses, but Abbey Elliot had such a natural beauty, smile, and the it factor, that it impressed me so much, I can’t wait till the next day to possibly see her on the reruns that Comedy Central shows . She should have been the queen after Wigg left, and even maybe while Wigg was still there. So unfortunately under used. Such natural talent , that doesn’t come by to often. Can’t wait to see what she does next . I’ve read that she is doing some kind of sitcom, but let’s get this diamond back in front of the big screen for all of us to enjoy.

  3. Not Fred, Unfortunately says:

    I was I was Fred. Who’s Fred?

  4. Jeff Leiboff says:

    The fact that she was banging Fred and then wasn’t might have been a factor in her not being used much too.

  5. When I heard she was done, I immediately it assumed it was because of what happened between her and Fred Armisen. I still think that has at least something to do with it.

More TV News from Variety