Cable News Pushes Mommy State Mentality

2010 kicked off with a pretty important column by the New York Times’ David Brooks. In it, he rightfully lamented the reaction to the recent attempted act of terrorism and what amounts to America’s immaturity — as if life could come with guarantees against bad things happening.

“Much of the criticism has been contemptuous and hysterical,” Brooks wrote, without making the final important connection — that most of that criticism and hysteria has found a non-stop platform on cable news, where the only reaction to a big story now seems to be overreaction.

Should profiling be expected to stop every crime attempt in advance? One would think so based on the parade of experts and strategists decrying the system’s failure.

As Brooks noted, a mature society would understand, in essence, that despite all good intentions, occasionally, shit happens. It’s simply impossible to preempt every potential threat.

Nobody in government is really making that point, but it’s worth noting that relatively few people in media have exhibited the courage to make it either. And in the latter case, it’s a completely self-serving proposition, inasmuch as keeping people scared is presumably a good way to keep an audience watching.

The column marks a nice start to the year for Brooks, who appears to pride himself on representing a rare voice of sobriety and reason. As for the rest of the media — and especially cable news — that continues to obsess over the so-called (and would-be) underwear bomber, not so much.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Bill says:

    Note however that had this occurred during Bush’s presidency, the cries of “Why isn’t he keeping us safe” would be even more deafening and would be just as rapid as the current administration’s attempts to blame Bush for the situation have been.

More Voices News from Variety

Loading