Here’s one that won’t be in Oprah’s Book Club

Kelley biography of Winfrey doesn't keep from dishing dirt

Is nothing sacred?

Kitty Kelley is making the rounds of the talkshows to hustle her new book, “Oprah” — well, not all the talkshows, because the folks at ABC and CBS don’t want to mess up their relationships with the Queen of All Media. Neither does Larry King.

After all, Oprah’s empire is wealthier than an emirate. Apart from her TV show, magazine and book club, Oprah will also launch her own 24-hour channel in January, thus expanding her ability to instruct her rapturous followers on what to read, eat and buy and, now and again, how to vote.

As her friend Maya Angelou once said, Oprah occupies a “spiritual position.” But now that Oprah will become even more ubiquitous, can she dial down her didactic rhetoric? Can Oprah the Shrill find a way to chill?

So why would Kitty Kelley tread upon holy turf? For one thing, she feels she has a story to tell dealing not only with Oprah’s formidable achievements but also her foibles and fears. Kelley has previously invaded the sanctums of Jackie Kennedy, Nancy Reagan and Frank Sinatra and she found Oprah’s friends and associates to be as uniquely fearful as Sinatra’s.

Oprah herself has had contradictory attitudes toward revealing details of her past. She has termed Kelley’s book a “so-called biography.” But Kelley reminds us that Oprah suddenly withdrew her memoir in 1993 despite a massive promotion and 750,000 first-print order. According to Kelley, the memoir listed those family members who had sexually abused her, as well her description of a period during which Winfrey allegedly referred to herself as a teenage “prostitute” — revelations that were urgently opposed by Oprah’s close advisers.

Overall, Kelley’s distinctly unauthorized biography veers between respect and snark. Oprah’s show itself is a 25-year TV legend, though her audience has declined from 9 million viewers in the 1995-96 season to about 6.5 million this year. Apart from her clout at launching books and products, she also has propelled the likes of Dr. Phil, Rachael Ray and Dr. Oz to stardom and is now banking on design maven Nate Berkus to strike syndie paydirt for her Harpo Prods.

As Oprah’s worth approaches $3 billion, Kelley suggests that a pattern of erratic behavior is setting in. In creating her channel (in concert with Discovery), she has gone through a succession of executives and delays. Her adventures in South Africa in setting up a girls school were both idealistic and disastrous.

Kelley alludes to Oprah’s complex sexuality, reminding us that she never got around to marrying longtime fiance Stedman S. Graham (“a prison guard-turned-escort”) and quotes associates suggesting a nuanced relationship with longtime friend Gayle King — “a prism of lesbian rumors,” Kelley says.

In researching her book, Kelley encountered a web of fear among Oprah’s friends. Those associated with her companies are chained to confidentiality agreements that bar them from talking about either Oprah or her businesses.

Answers to the larger question about the Oprah phenomenon — the source of her unshakable connection to her audience — are more elusive. Initially her appeal was rooted in her by-the-bootstraps story of overcoming adversity. And she still projects a kind of earthiness (albeit the billionaire brand), even as her devotees seem to yearn to touch the hem of her garment.

Kelley’s conclusion: Oprah is both “magnanimous and deeply caring but also sometimes petty, small-minded and self-centered. There is a warm side to Oprah and a side that can only be called as cold as ice.”

Maybe all that goes with being as rich as an emirate.

A good ‘Ass’ kicking

Matthew Vaughn had the last laughs last week. His movie, “Kick-Ass,” ended up as the No. 1 box office hit. All of the studios had turned down his $28 million project, with Lionsgate finally garnering distribution rights in the U.S.

Roger Ebert may have called the film “reprehensible,” but I found it hilarious — a melee in search of a movie. Vaughn, who is a Brit, is convinced the studio rejections reflect Hollywood’s commitment to retro thinking.

Hollywood studios are determined to make the same two or three movies over and over, he believes, and hence didn’t “get” the perverse appeal of “Kick-Ass.”

To some critics, “Kick-Ass” is a nihilistic sendup of the superhero genre. Vaughn (who previously directed “Stardust”) feels it’s a post-modern love letter to the superhero genre.

Having made a movie which he cheerfully admits should not be seen by kids, Vaughn will make a kids movie next. He and wife Claudia Schiffer have two children, with a third due imminently, and he feels he owes one to the home team.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More Scene News from Variety