Critics score on the best pic nominees

Best picture contenders drew a range of critical response

Metacritic score: 84
Rotten Tomatoes: 82
Worldwide B.O.: $2.1 billion
Awards: N.Y. Online Critics
The good: “You’ve never experienced anything like it, and neither has anyone else.” — Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times
The bad: “… clears the hurdle in being optical eye candy. Its story, though, is pure cheese.” — Joe Neumaier, New York Daily News

Metacritic score: 53
Rotten Tomatoes: 70
Worldwide B.O.: $238 million
The good: “… with a lot of heart and energy, this movie tells a real-life tall tale.” — Michael Sragow, the Baltimore Sun
The bad: “… blinkered middle-class pandering at its most shameless.” — David Fear, Time Out New York

Metacritic score: 81
Rotten Tomatoes: 82
Worldwide B.O.: $204.5 million
The good: “Madly original, cheekily political, altogether exciting.” — Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly
The bad: “The backstory beats the hell out of the present-tense plot.” — J.R. Jones, Chicago Reader

Metacritic score: 85
Rotten Tomatoes: 94
Worldwide B.O.: $14.4 million
Awards: Sundance (Audience Award)
The good: “Romantic and wonderfully entertaining.” — Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun Times
The bad: “A decent but unremarkable film.” — Dan Jolin, Empire

Metacritic score: 94
Rotten Tomatoes: 97
Worldwide B.O.: $15.3 million
Awards: Austin Film Critics, Boston Society of Film Critics, Los Angeles Film Critics, New York Film Critics, Washington, D.C., Film Critics.
The good: “A near-perfect movie.” — Richard Corliss, Time
The bad: “… doesn’t bring anything new to the-grunts-in-the-firing-line movies.” — Derek Elley, Variety

Metacritic score: 69
Rotten Tomatoes: 88
Worldwide B.O.: $311.9 million
Awards: San Diego Film Critics
The good: “It’s a fiendishly entertaining flick.” — Joe Williams, St. Louis Dispatch
The bad: “It’s not boring, but it’s ridiculous and appallingly insensitive.” — David Denby, the New Yorker

Metacritic score: 79
Rotten Tomatoes: 92
Worldwide B.O.: $46.2 million
Awards: Sundance (Grand Jury Award)
The good: “Genuinely and irresistibly inspirational.” — Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal
The bad: “What’s most bewildering about Sundance sensation ‘Precious’ is its overall shrug-worthiness.” — Keith Uhlich, Time Out New York

Metacritic score: 79
Rotten Tomatoes: 87
Worldwide B.O.: $19.6 million
The good: “A tart, brilliantly acted fable of life’s little cosmic difficulties.” — Michael Phillips,
Chicago Tribune
The bad: “It’s hell to sit through.” — David Denby, the New Yorker

Metacritic score: 88
Rotten Tomatoes: 98
Worldwide B.O.: $672.3 million
The good: “A breathtaking ride into a realm of pure imagination.” — Peter Travers, Rolling Stone
The bad: “‘Up’ left me cold.” — Stephanie Zacharek,

Metacritic score: 83
Rotten Tomatoes: 89
Worldwide B.O.: $93.2 million
Awards: National Board of Review, Southeastern Film Critics
The good: “A smart, alert, supremely entertaining movie.” — Ann Hornaday, the Washington Post
The bad: “A movie that is easy to like — and dislike as well.” — J. Hoberman, Village Voice

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More Film News from Variety