Projecting Drudge’s Conservative Bias Onto ‘V’

The right-leaning Drudge Report of course linked to Miami Herald TV critic Glenn Garvin’s review of the new ABC series “V,” which ran in the Chicago Tribune under the headline “‘V’ aims at Obamamania.” But I’m afraid the piece in question tells you a whole lot more about the politics of Garvin than the show’s producers.

The subject, in fact, came up at the TV Critics Assn. tour over the summer. For all I know Garvin was the Vpicone who asked the question about whether the producers were skewering Obama by including references to “hope” and “universal healthcare” within the show about aliens coming to Earth, offering the lure of fabulous solutions to our problems.

According to a transcript, though, here’s what executive producer Jeffrey Bell said at the time:

“Look, there are always going to be people who will look for agendas in everything. This show was conceived during the Bush administration. It got executed in an Obama administration. There are people on either sides of the aisle who can find things. You can say,’Yeah, look how stupid these people are for following blindly and believing everything the government is saying,’ and you can have people who are upset about that. And you can have other people saying,’Look at these people who are promising everything at no cost, and look, they are leading them to their own doom.’ And so, for us, both sides have strengths and weaknesses. … But to try to tie it to the birthers or anything, I find, is kind of, you know, ridiculous.”

And here’s what exec producer Scott Peters said on the same topic:

“It’s a subjective experience to watch a television show. I think that if you are bringing something to a show and watching it, looking for something in it, you can find it whether you are on one side of the political spectrum or the other. The main theme of the show is dealing with blind devotion, and I think that you can sort of look at that in two different ways. And, you know, people will bring to it what they bring to it, and I think it’s our job as storytellers to put some provocative things out there and leave things open to interpretation to really bring an audience to it and really be compelled by it.”

Peters, by the way, was just replaced by Scott Rosenbaum as the program’s showrunner, which continues “V’s” unusually tortured path to the screen — especially given how positive many of the early reviews (mine included) have been. Still, in terms of the show being some kind of screed against the Obama administration, that appears to be far more about what Garvin perhaps wanted to see than what’s actually there.

In other words, as Freud might say, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. And sometimes a headline is more compelling than the insights that go with it.

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply

5 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. mrl says:

    This show was conceived in the 80’s however it’s tone of blind devotion, a country seduced by a group of people with a radical agenda…well, if you can’t put two and two together to get for and the Obama administration then you might as well go and join the peace ambassador program or ahem, Obama’s “civilian national security force” that he spoke about at a campaign stop last year before he was elected.
    If the show was conceptualized in 2007 under Bush, well, that’s exactly around the same time that Obama began his campaign for office.
    When I watch this show, all I think of to compare IS Obama, the propaganda, the gigantic O’s plastered all over the place. CHANGE HOPE and millions of sheeple who had BLIND DEVOTION for a man who promised everything and has yet to deliver nothing.
    Does Obama have lizard skin? Of course not. Does he and his people behind him have communist and totalitarian intentions. You bet.
    By the way, I LOVE THE SHOW.

  2. Brian Lowry says:

    Actually, the point of saying “For all I know” Garvin asked the question was that he might have been the only person who drew that inference. The transcript doesn’t identify who asked. And actually, I probably would object to the same inference about the Bush administration. It’s an update of a 1980s sci-fi show with lizards wearing people costumes. Anyone who reads too much into it on either side would sound slightly dopey.

  3. Julie W says:

    By the way, nice journalistic integrity, saying, “For all I know” Garvin asked the question about the producers’ “skewering” Obama. That’s like me saying, “For all I know, Brian Lowry is a serial killer.” I guess this is why they put your stuff as a blog and not as a real article.

  4. Julie W says:

    Brian, the truth is, if “V” aired during the Bush administration, you wouldn’t have posted anything remotely like this article. You show your bias just as much as anyone else you accused.

  5. Rob Smith Jr says:

    Hmmmmm…The evasive answers, particularly Peters, seems to lead one to believe that they are concerned what government might do. We had controls a bit with Bush and now at full tilt with Obama. It really looks like the insights are more than the headline.

More Voices News from Variety

Loading