Comic-Con Journal: Olson Slaps Down ‘Transformers’

“A History of Violence” screenwriter Josh Olson probably won’t be collaborating with “Transformers” director Michael Bay anytime soon.

During a closing-day Comic-Con panel about the art of adapting comics to the screen, Olson asked who in the audience had seen “Transformers 2.” When a few people applauded (and some actually whooped), Olson told the people sitting next to those making noise to smack them. “You guys are why movies are so hard to make,” he said, adding, “There’s an audience out there that is big, loud and dumb. … The more you keep feeding these monstrosities, the harder it gets to do good work.”

Olson was joined by David Hayter — who tackled adapting “Watchmen,” often called the Moby Dick of comics, as well as the X-Men features — and DC Comics creative affairs exec Gregory Noveck, whose job it is to serve as the liaison between the comics publisher and Warner Bros. in adapting DC titles. As Noveck put it, while there are several valid versions of Batman that have been put on screen, “What you want to avoid is the Joel Schumacher interpretation of Batman,” alluding to the director of the critically dismissed “Batman Forever” and “Batman & Robin.”

Hayter (apparently still recovering from the previous night’s “Watchmen” director’s cut event) was slightly more diplomatic, saying that when pitching a movie to studio execs, “Really what they want to know is, ‘How do we sell this film?'” He also noted that with strong material that’s already bonded with a sizable audience such as “Watchmen,” the primary goal should be “not to screw it up.”

The art of adapting comics is far from a mere academic pursuit. Indeed, as the industry makes the transition from widely recognizable properties like Superman and Spider-Man to such lesser lights as Green Lantern and Thor — as well as various projects being done for TV on a less ostentatious scale — the question of how to deal with the source material respectfully while ensuring that projects remain broadly commercial is the 64-million-dollar (and then some) question.

Still, as Olson noted, not all adaptations — or if you prefer, transformations — are created equal.

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 5

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Scott says:

    Doesn’t he have a Bazooka Joe adaptation to write or something?

  2. Kenny Arbuckle says:

    Olson is reduced to slamming movie projects he’s not involved in at comic book conventions. We won’t see much more of him.

  3. Jack Skellington says:

    Isn’t Josh Olson the talented auteur who wrote Infested?
    Yeah, I’m sure it’s all Transformers’ fault that it’s hard to make good work.

  4. David C. says:

    Olson talks pretty big for someone who took a job adapting Halo!!!! I think he’s just looking for an excuse for why he hasn’t had a movie made in five years. Too honest! Ha!!!

  5. Alan Coil says:

    Olson’s sumpin or another, isn’t he?

More Voices News from Variety