The President and Polanski

Updated

The arrest of Roman Polanski is the type of thing that the White House wouldn’t want to touch with a ten foot pole, but spokesman Robert Gibbs couldn’t avoid it when he was asked about it at today’s press briefing.

Q: Will the President pardon Polanski?  Will he, or not?

GIBBS:  I don’t know of any pending pardon request, Lester.

Q: Does he believe pedophiles should not be prosecuted?

GIBBS:  The President believes pedophiles should be prosecuted, Lester.

Q: Thank you.

Patrick Goldstein of the Los Angeles Times writes that his e-mail has been running about 100-to-1 against his post earlier this week that questioned why the Los Angeles County D.A.’s office was pursuing Polanski now, in the face of budget cuts.

“I didn’t say Polanski should be pardoned or let off the hook, since what he did was reprehensible. He is guilty as charged. I did say that we should concentrate on doing a better job of tracking down the bad guys who are breaking the law right now in our own backyard. The response to my argument was divided, to say the least. People inside Hollywood nodded their heads in agreement. People outside of showbiz were outraged.”

But he challenges the notion that this is a clear-cut left right divide, noting blog posts against Polanski on the Huffington Post and citing the case of G. Gordon Liddy.

He also writes, “President Jimmy Carter, the ultimate squishy moral relativist in the eyes of the right, commuted Liddy’s sentence to eight years (“out of the interest of equity and fairness”) while LSD guru Timothy Leary, who’d once been arrested and prosecuted by Liddy, cheerfully went out on the lecture circuit with his former adversary to make some quick dough. Liddy now makes his living as a radio talk show host, where he periodically advises good honest citizens — as he did several times in 1994 — how to fend off agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, saying that if the agents come armed, people should “go for a head shot; they’re going to be wearing bulletproof vests.”

“We don’t need to worry about Liddy anymore — he’s obviously been rehabilitated. But not Polanski. He hasn’t served his time. He skipped town, sensing, as most people involved with the case have since concluded, that the judge had his own agenda and was going to bring the hammer down on him. But worrying about judicial fairness when it comes to a sexual predator would inject a layer of complexity into this affair that most people don’t want to hear. Call it justice or call it vengeance, but people are town-hall-style angry that Polanski got off scott free, just as they are mad at the bankers on Wall Street who got bailed out — after socking away millions in profit — while regular folks got the shaft.”

Update: Count Ezra Klein, liberal blogger for the Washington Post, among those who don’t buy the Polanski defense.

More outrage at Whoopi Goldberg’s comments on “The View” here. She said, “We’re a different kind of society. We see things differently. The world sees 13 year olds and 14 year olds in the rest of Europe… not everybody agrees with the way we see things. […] Would I want my 14 year old having sex with somebody? Not necessarily…”

Peter Bart recalls helping to lure Polanski to Hollywood to direct “Rosemary’s Baby,” but finding that the director’s personal life was like a “living cauldron.”

He writes, “Two years ago, I spent time with him at the Cannes Film Festival, and he seemed to be in a buoyant mood. But when I asked him whether he’d ever like to live in Hollywood again, he was nervous and indecisive. It seemed as though he wanted the right to return and deal with the problems of the past. At the same time his life in Hollywood had, in some ways, been a re-run of the nightmares of his past.

“Under the present circumstances, I hope he will never return whether by choice or by mandate of the court. Though I acknowledge that his crime was a hideous one, Roman Polanski is an artist who has suffered greatly, who has caused and survived great danger and who, after all, deserves to live his life.”

 

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 6

Leave a Reply

6 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Joe says:

    What in the world does Liddy have to do with this anyway? Tell you what, if Polanski were to agree to serve the same 8 years Liddy served for his ill-conceived burglary I’d have no problem with that. Or do you believe Liddy’s burglary was more heinous than Polanski’s drugging and raping of a 13-year old child?

  2. z says:

    It’s got nothing to do with Polanski as an “artist”… It has to do with the rule of law, and whether the law applies to all equally. Whether Polanski suffered or did not suffer is utterly irrelevant. Whether he has honorary degrees or titles bestowed up on him for all his great achievements…is irrelevant. It’s whether the law applies. As for Hollywood, those who formed the petition are elitist snobs, believing themselves to be above the law. Perhaps they would feel differently if their children were drugged and sodomized against their will. Will the great auteur be pardoned? Politically, it would be suicide for the president, who would in effect be saying, the United States legal system, which I represent, is a joke.

  3. JoeC says:

    Polanski gave drugs and alcohol to a 13 year old. He raped her in the vagina and the anus. She cried and asked him to stop. He didn’t stop. He was charged and pled to a lesser offense, then fled the country.
    Not a damn thing honorable here. I don’t care how brilliant a film maker he is – he sucks as a human.
    Throw him in the general population of any prison. His fellow prisoners will teach him what it is to be raped.

  4. low says:

    “Under the present circumstances, I hope he will never return whether by choice or by mandate of the court. Though I acknowledge that his crime was a hideous one, Roman Polanski is an artist who has suffered greatly, who has caused and survived great danger and who, after all, deserves to live his life.”- So I guess being an artist is now a legal defense. I love how Hollywood starts by saying that what he did was disgusting BUT HE’S AN ARTIST. You know Charlie Manson was an “artist”. Maybe if every rapist picks up painting right before their trail they can get off.

  5. Cowboy Logic says:

    I am sure he will pardon Roman Polanski, and OJ Simpson too.

  6. realitysurfer says:

    Please take a moment to check out my new LSD Documentary film.
    POWER AND CONTROL :LSD IN THE 60’s
    Features the CIA LSD Brothel in San Francisco (MK ULTRA), Groucho Marx’s LSD Trip….Doc Ellis pitches his no-hitter while high.
    Tim Leary’s Miricle of Good friday Experiment is explored with one of the original PREACHERS who took part.
    LSD and the Protest Movement, JFK & LSD plus more.
    All posted for free at this youtube link..please share this knowledge.


More Biz News from Variety

Loading