Review: ‘Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father’

What begins as a poignant tribute to filmmaker Kurt Kuenne's dead best friend snowballs into a gut-wrenching true-crime story in "Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father."

What begins as a poignant tribute to filmmaker Kurt Kuenne’s dead best friend snowballs into a gut-wrenching true-crime story in “Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father,” a film that, like the twist-filled events it covers, isn’t always what it appears to be. Though presented as a visual scrapbook for the victim’s son Zachary, Kuenne initiated the project before learning Andrew Bagby’s unstable ex-lover was pregnant with their unborn son when the murder was committed. By addressing the memorial to young Zachary, Kuenne lands on a human-interest hook that has made the pic the talk of Slamdance.

Kuenne would probably be the first to admit he’s crafted a shamelessly manipulative version of events, one that works best for audiences who know nothing about the case (which was widely publicized in “Dance With the Devil,” a bestseller written by Andrew’s father, David Bagby). Considering how much more tragedy lies in store, one can hardly fault the helmer for using the elements at his disposal — from a button-pushing piano score to saintly photos and homevideos left behind — to transform his personal tribute into a full-blown polemic. As dozens of oncamera interviews show, those who survived Andrew were angry and hurt by his murder, and the film will leave auds feeling no differently.

When they were kids, Andrew Bagby starred in all Kuenne’s amateur movies, which means the helmer has boxes of footage of his friend. “Dear Zachary” is, above all, a virtuoso feat in editing, and Kuenne uses the material at his disposal to devastating effect. For example, a short film about time travel, in which Bagby can be seen saying, “I’ll go back in time and stop people dying,” takes on a painful new irony in this context.

Rather than letting friends and family share specific memories onscreen, Kuenne blends them together in sweeping, rapidly edited montages. The stories dissolve into one another, leaving audiences with an impressionistic sense of Bagby’s legacy — a succession of smiling faces, it turns out, can say as much as hours of longwinded testimonials.

As for Shirley Turner, the 40-year-old woman (Andrew was 28) who drove 1,600 miles to shoot Andrew after they broke up, Kuenne selects the least flattering footage possible. By crosscutting between court papers and pathological phone messages to Andrew’s parents, Kuenne captures a sense of this deeply disturbed woman.

But there’s more to Turner than meets the eye, and “Dear Zachary” switches gears, attacking the system and the individuals who allowed “a probably premeditated first-degree murderer go free.”

The way Kuenne presents the material, with an aggressive style that lingers less than a second on most shots, it’s impossible not to feel emotionally exhausted.

Dear Zachary: A Letter to a Son About His Father

Production

Produced, directed, written, edited by Kurt Kuenne.

Crew

Camera (color DV), Kuenne; music, Kuenne; sound, Kuenne. Reviewed on DVD, Park City, Utah. (In Slamdance Film Festival), Jan. 22, 2008. Running time: 95 MIN.

With

David Bagby, Kathleen Bagby, Andrew Bagby, Zachary Andrew, Heather Arnold, Shirley Turner, Kurt Kuenne.
Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 3

Leave a Reply

3 Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Jay Brooks says:

    You idiot, how you could insinuate any sort of one sided portray of this women is shameful, you should take a long look in the mirror pal.

    Jay

  2. David says:

    Peter – What else is there to Turner? What “meets the eye” in the film is that Turner is a sick and evil women who deserves all of our scorn and not an ounce of our sympathy. Is there “more” to her than this? Or, is your word choice just so sloppy that readers might presume you have sympathy for the women. It’s UNCLEAR. For your sake and reputation, you should expound.

  3. vnghan says:

    Touching and horified

More Film News from Variety

Loading