Globes to fall frosh: Drop dead

Chuck_2 The Golden Globes had little use for this year’s crop of fall frosh. In fact, if it weren’t for ABC, it would be as if the fall season never even happened.

“Pushing Daisies” did nicely, garnering noms for best comedy and its two leads. “Dirty Sexy Money” and “Samantha Who?” also got some props in the acting categories.

But ABC aside, Hollywood Foreign Press Assn. voters snubbed every other program that debuted on the Big Five nets this fall.

In fairness, it’s not as if the class of 2007 has much to be proud of. And the Globes honored plenty of other newcomers– on cable (‘Sup “Mad Men”? Howyoudoin, “Damages”?)

But why no shout out for “Chuck,” the most fun you can have watching an hour of TV these days? Zachary Levi (left) was perfect as the adorkable title character.

I’d also like to have seen Jim Parsons snag some supporting actor love for his Nile Crane-ian performance on “The Big Bang Theory.” Never thought I’d be lovin’ a Chuck Lorre show– well, I guess I kinda liked early “Dharma and Greg”– but there you have it.

Given how much buzz “Gossip Girl” has gotten, I though Blake Lively might have had a shot for a nom (remember the Globes loved “Felicity” before anyone even knew who Keri Russell was).

“Cane” is very mainstream, and very low-rated, but Jimmy Smits’ starpower might’ve been enough to land a nom in a less competitive year.

And it’s a bit of a stunner that neither Kelsey Grammer nor Patricia Heaton got a mention for “Back to You.” Again, the show isn’t perfect, but they’re Big Stars. Emmy will likely be kinder.

NBC, meanwhile, was probably hoping Damian Lewis might’ve snuck through for “Life.” But since the HFPA also shut out the far superior “Friday Night Lights,” they shouldn’t be surprised.

Anyone else you think shoud’ve been nommed? Click on the lil’ “comments” button below.

–Josef Adalian

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 2

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Wonderful page may make endless growth, with thanks present, all the build up about skills can be to keep on getting to know, curiosity is normally the start of immense success.

  2. Shaun says:

    I think it’s a crime that FNL got nothing (Kyle Chandler and Connie Britton are so deserving) and I should be used to Battlestar Galactica getting no recognition even though every single person on that show acts their frakkin hearts out. What I don’t get though is how Rose Byrne was nominated for Best Supporting Actress for Damages when the show revolved completely around her. Either way, I think the HWFP are a bunch of morons. Who in their right mind nominates Kathering Heigl (whom I do really like) over Chandra Wilson this season? Seriously.

More TV News from Variety