The “No Dirty Tricks” Campaign

Actor Bradley Whitford debuted an online video he created as part of a new push by the Courage Campaign to defeat a Republican-led effort to change the way that California calculates its presidential electoral votes.

It’s just the latest in an attempt to stop the Presidential Election Reform Act initiative, which would end the “winner-take-all” system of awarding the state’s electors and replace it with one where they are divvied up by the winner in each congressional district. Such a method, Whitford says, would give the GOP a leg up in the presidential election. Democrats would lose about 20 electoral votes, given the current makeup of the state’s districts. That would make it very difficult to win the White House, because the Democrats have depended on California’s 55 electoral votes as a base of support.

Signatures are now being collected by Californians for Equal Representation to put the initiative on the June, 2008 ballot.

A group called Californians for Fair Election Reform, which includes some of the states Democratic leaders, has been running ads warning voters of the measure, characterizing it as a partisan power grab.

And the progressive group Courage Campaign, led by producer Rick Jacobs, has launched a separate effort called as a way of engaging bloggers and other online activists to try to defeat the measure.

“The Republicans, because they do not have a majority of Americans on the issues, have become dependent on these kind of shady strategies,” Whitford said in a conference call on Monday with bloggers and other activists.

Opponents fear that voter turnout will be low in June, and that only the most die-hard supporters — i..e. the GOP base — will turn out to support it.

“The election could be over, here, in June 2008,” Jacobs said on the conference call.

Although the measure is not yet on the ballot, opponents appear to have adopted a strategy of stopping the initiative before it gets any farther.

Political strategist Chris Lehane, who has been advising Californians for Fair Election Reform, points to polling that shows that although a majority of Californians support the idea, it is less than 50%, and even less than 40% by one measure. That’s not a great place to be at the start of an initiative campaign, he says.

Supporters say the measure is needed to more accurately represent the vote in such a large, diverse state. Kevin Eckery, the spokesman for the measure, has said that he’s actually encouraged by the poll numbers and that voters should be given the chance to decide for themselves. He said, “They don’t want to be told, ‘Don’t put it on the ballot.’ Even if they are going to vote ‘no,’ they want the right to vote ‘no.'”

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 6

Leave a Reply


Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Poor liberal losers — always paranoid that the GOP will beat them.

  2. Gary W. Carpenter says:

    The Republicans care very little about the Constitution when it gets in their way!

  3. De says:

    Go Bradley STOP the big cry babies in the California GOP.How childish and absolutely unacceptable.I am in Fla and will help in any way to Halt this measure.What can out of staters do?

  4. BartLinkletter says:

    GOP just wants to push this constitutional travesty through in June, win the election with CA splitting its electors, and then deal with the lawsuits after the next GOP Pres. (Jeb?) is sworn in on Jan. 20, 2009.
    Remember 2000? They’re pretty good at winning post-election lawsuits. It was Bush v. Gore, not the other way around. And they always have the Right Wing Supreme Court to give their guy the final kiss of approval.

  5. Dem02020 says:

    I’m not sure why people think this type of Legislation can be passed by a “ballot initiative”, when the U.S. Constitution clearly and specifically authorizes the State Legislatures in this matter.
    Article II, Section 1. “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the State Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors…”
    A “ballot initiative” is by it’s definition, a “going around” or circumvention of the State Legislature; but to circumvent the State Legislature in this matter would be unconstitutional, as circumventing the constitutional authority of the State Legislature to “appoint in such Manner as” they “may direct, a Number of Electors…”
    The only precedent in this matter that I know of, of a State apportioning it’s Electoral Vote, are the States of Maine and Nebraska.
    Is someone saying those States apportioned their Electoral Vote by way of a “ballot initiative”?
    It would seem to me it would have had to have been done by an Act of the State Legislature, for it to have been Constitutional.
    And the same seems true in this instance, and with California’s State Assembly.

More Biz News from Variety