Academia under review

Letter to the editor

In his March 5 column, Brian Lowry writes, “Welcome to the new and not-exactly-improved world of academia, where professors lobby, jockey and retain publicists to help flog books and push research …. Then there are the many professors pimping to serve as pundits, such as Fordham U. media professor Paul Levinson, pitched as being ‘available before, during and after’ the Oscars to help journalists evaluate the show. That’s right, during.”

I see at least four errors:

1. A pimp is someone who makes money off of hookers. Maybe Mr. Lowry meant that I am a metaphorical hooker, but I make no money by making myself available for media interviews.

2. I have hired no publicist to promote me or my books.

3. I admit that my novel, “The Plot to Save Socrates,” was published a few weeks before the Oscars, but the novel had no connection to my availability as an expert to talk about this year’s Academy Awards.

4. I’m puzzled as to what especially bothers Mr. Lowry about my being available “during” the Oscars. I would think it would be helpful to reporters, particularly in a tight-deadline topic such as the Oscars.

All in all, I would give Mr. Lowry’s article a C-. Skimpy research, faulty logic, lame use of metaphor.

Paul Levinson
Fordham U.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More Voices News from Variety

Loading