Kirch wins Deutsche case

Bank to pay damages to bankrupt media mogul

BERLIN — Germany’s highest court ruled Tuesday that Deutsche Bank must pay damages to bankrupt media mogul Leo Kirch because of comments made by its former chief exec that caused the collapse of Kirch’s once-vast media empire.

The bank now faces a separate lawsuit to determine the amount of the damages.

Kirch is suing Deutsche Bank and Rolf Breuer, currently its supervisory board chairman, over a 2002 interview in which Breuer cast doubt on Kirch’s creditworthiness while his company was struggling under a moun-tain of debt.

The interview caused uncertainty in the Kirch Group among lending institutions, which recalled their loans.

Breuer’s comments “broke a duty not to endanger the creditworthiness of the unit” with which the bank had a business relationship, Judge Gerd Nobbe said at the Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe.

The decision upholds a 2003 ruling by the Munich Higher Regional Court, which said the bank could be held responsible for Breuer’s com-ments because they contributed to the collapse of Kirch’s company and violated German secrecy rules.

Tuesday’s ruling limits the amount of damages Kirch will collect, since the court held that Deutsche Bank could only be liable to the Kirch Group’s Print Beteiligungs division.

Deutsche Bank had loaned more than E700 million ($860 million) to Print Beteiligungs, requiring the bank to maintain secrecy about that busi-ness’s financial state, Nobbe said.

Kirch had argued the confidentiality requirement should extend to his entire company.

Print Beteiligungs held Kirch’s 40% stake in publishing giant Axel Springer, which now is seeking to take over ProSiebenSat.1, once Kirch’s core TV business.

Following Kirch’s insolvency, Deutsche Bank nabbed the Springer stake in lieu of the outstanding loan.

Nobbe advised Kirch and Deutsche Bank lawyers to settle out of court, adding, “Kirch will have to dismiss the idea of reversing the collapse of his company with the help of a lawsuit.”

Deutsche Bank lawyer Peter Heckel said the bank “strongly disagrees” that damages can be proven.

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More Biz News from Variety