Flatley settlement demand not SLAPP-proof

Payment demands constituted criminal extortion

In a decision that will make it easier for celebrities to fight spurious lawsuits, the California Supreme Court held Thursday that a settlement demand made to entertainer Michael Flatley constituted extortion and was not protected speech under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute.

The legal saga began when Flatley was accused of rape in 2003 by Tyna Marie Robertson. Flatley contended the sex was consensual, and the rape case was never pursued; Robertson’s two civil suits also were dismissed. But Flatley’s attorney, Bert Fields, sued Robertson’s attorney, D. Dean Mauro for extortion and intentional infliction of emotional distress. In the trial court, Mauro moved to strike the complaint, arguing that his pre-litigation settlement demand offering to settle the case for seven figures was constitutionally protected speech under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. (SLAPP is an acronym for strategic lawsuit against public participation).

Both the trial court and the California Court of Appeal held that Mauro’s letter and subsequent telephone calls demanding payment constituted criminal extortion, were not constitutionally protected speech and that the anti-SLAPP statute did not apply.

Said Fields of Thursday’s victory: “Naturally, Michael and I are delighted with the court’s ruling. It’s always an inspiring thing for a lawyer to appear before the California Supreme Court, but it’s particularly inspiring when you win.”

In upholding the lower courts’ decisions, the California Supreme Court pointed out that Mauro’s settlement demand included a list of dozens of news outlets that would receive press releases about the alleged rape if payment was not made immediately. When Mauro contacted Fields, he told Fields that if Flatley didn’t pay he would go public and the story would follow him around and ruin him. Fields responded by contacting the FBI to report Mauro’s conduct and to arrange for Flatley to give the FBI a voluntary interview.

In finding that Mauro’s conduct constituted criminal extortion as a matter of law, the California Supreme Court cited the fact that Mauro would not discuss the particulars of the case, but just gave a deadline for payment and that he threatened to go public and ruin Flatley if he demands weren’t met.

More Biz

  • A man watches a baseball game

    The Big Gamble: Is Sports Betting Really a $7 Billion Media Windfall?

    In a decision that will make it easier for celebrities to fight spurious lawsuits, the California Supreme Court held Thursday that a settlement demand made to entertainer Michael Flatley constituted extortion and was not protected speech under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. The legal saga began when Flatley was accused of rape in 2003 by Tyna […]

  • Leslie Moonves

    CBS Amends Lawsuit Against National Amusements, Claims Bylaw Changes Are Invalid

    In a decision that will make it easier for celebrities to fight spurious lawsuits, the California Supreme Court held Thursday that a settlement demand made to entertainer Michael Flatley constituted extortion and was not protected speech under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. The legal saga began when Flatley was accused of rape in 2003 by Tyna […]

  • Univision logo

    Univision Plans to Name Vince Sadusky CEO (Reports)

    In a decision that will make it easier for celebrities to fight spurious lawsuits, the California Supreme Court held Thursday that a settlement demand made to entertainer Michael Flatley constituted extortion and was not protected speech under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. The legal saga began when Flatley was accused of rape in 2003 by Tyna […]

  • Comcast

    Comcast Says It's Ready to Outbid Disney for 21st Century Fox

    In a decision that will make it easier for celebrities to fight spurious lawsuits, the California Supreme Court held Thursday that a settlement demand made to entertainer Michael Flatley constituted extortion and was not protected speech under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. The legal saga began when Flatley was accused of rape in 2003 by Tyna […]

  • Pokemon World Championships

    Japan's Imagica Robot Holdings to Be Renamed Imagica Group

    In a decision that will make it easier for celebrities to fight spurious lawsuits, the California Supreme Court held Thursday that a settlement demand made to entertainer Michael Flatley constituted extortion and was not protected speech under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. The legal saga began when Flatley was accused of rape in 2003 by Tyna […]

  • PHILIP ROTHF.SCOTT FITZGERALD

    Pulitzer Prize-Winning Author Philip Roth Dies at 85

    In a decision that will make it easier for celebrities to fight spurious lawsuits, the California Supreme Court held Thursday that a settlement demand made to entertainer Michael Flatley constituted extortion and was not protected speech under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. The legal saga began when Flatley was accused of rape in 2003 by Tyna […]

  • Colin Callender on 'Cursed Child' and

    Strictly Business Podcast: Colin Callender on 'Cursed Child' and Navigating Co-Productions

    In a decision that will make it easier for celebrities to fight spurious lawsuits, the California Supreme Court held Thursday that a settlement demand made to entertainer Michael Flatley constituted extortion and was not protected speech under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute. The legal saga began when Flatley was accused of rape in 2003 by Tyna […]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content