Screener scheme

Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

I’ve been a voting Academy (Executive Branch) member for more than 25 years and I’ve observed some of its rules from ridiculous to really ridiculous. I’m pointing particularly at the practice of the studios sending voters copies of films, which have Award potential in one category or another.

They come to us, figuratively like dirty films in plain brown wrappers. The Academy wants to protect its members from being influenced by graphics or any advertising elements including names of the stars or any resume of the film.

This in the face of a barrage of advertising in Variety singing the praises, as it should, of the particular film. The phrase “for your consideration” is a euphemism for “vote for us, dammit!”

Marketing and publicity are almost as much of the lifeblood of a film as the movie itself. So in the most important industry in the free world disseminating entertainment and information, why try to gag the mouth that feeds us?

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More Biz News from Variety

Loading