Letter to the Editor: David Elfick

After reading “Hollywood gets in the foot in the Cannes d’or” in Variety April 23-29, I felt that an Australian response was necessary.

What constitutes the definition of country of origin when a film competes in Cannes? According to Variety, “Moulin Rouge” is a U.S. film. “Moulin Rouge” was

1. Shot in Sydney, Australia at the Fox lot, a piece of prime real estate generously provided to the American media giant by the New South Wales State Government.

2. Baz Luhrmann, the director, is Australian.

3. Nicole Kidman, the star, is Australian.

4. Martin Brown, the producer, is Australian.

5. The production designer, director of photography and key creative heads were all Australians, as were a large proportion of the cast.

But the finance came from the U.S., and the film will be marketed by an American company worldwide.

So from this are we to assume that the definition of the country of origin is the source of finance from the majority investor?

While your article has a subheading “Brits, Aussies, absent” I would expect that there would be a few Australians there at the opening night of “Moulin Rouge.”

After all, they did create the product.

David Elfick,

Palm Beach Pictures

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More Voices News from Variety