Suit vs. Napster moves on

Metallica, Dr. Dre file similar cases

The next shots in the copyright infringement battle between Internet file-sharing company Napster and RIAA will be heard in a San Francisco courtroom.

In a late Friday ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn Patel denied Napster’s claims that it was a mere service provider and wasn’t liable for its users’ actions.

Citing a specific section of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, Napster had requested a summary judgment — asking the judge to decide the case based on the present facts.

“Napster just lost its last delaying tactic,” Recording Industry Assn. of America prexy & CEO Hilary Rosen said.

RIAA, which reps all the major record labels, maintains Napster’s service allowing individual users to easily trade MP3 sound files with one another creates a virtual haven for unauthorized duplication of copyrighted material. The industry org filed suit last December.

The San Mateo, Calif.-based Napster is facing similar suits from hard-rockers Metallica and rapper Dr. Dre.

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0


    Leave a Reply

    No Comments

    Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

    You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

    More Digital News from Variety