Court rules against use of ‘Elvis’ moniker

Houstonians won't be eating at 'The Velvet Elvis'

In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.”

The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate.

Mark Lee of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips who represented Elvis Presley Enterprises said, “This is an important decision for Elvis Presley Enterprises and the law of parody. The opinion shows people cannot freely take others’ intellectual property rights and cry parody to justify their actions.”

The case was brought by Elvis Presley Enterprises, which owns all trademarks and publicity rights belonging to the Presley estate. It sought to prevent a Houston bar, which featured velvet paintings of Elvis, a frozen drink called “Love Me Blenders” and a hot dog named “Your Football Hound Dog,” from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.”

More Biz

  • Sumner Redstone

    Sumner Redstone's Ex-Girlfriend Fights With Nurse For Access to Secret Tapes

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Disney-Fox Deal Sets Up Scramble for

    Disney-Fox Deal Unleashes Flood of Free-Agent Executives, Talent

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Paul Haggis Lawsuit

    Paul Haggis Hit With Lawsuit for Alleged Rape, Claims a $9 Million Shakedown

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Sirius Logo

    SiriusXM Hit With Big Rate Hike by Copyright Royalty Board

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Warner Music Group Logo

    Warner Music Taking Disciplinary Action Against Exec VP Jeff Fenster for Sexual Harassment

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

  • Leonardo Da Vinci Salvator Mundi Auction

    How a Restored da Vinci Became the Most Expensive Artwork Ever

    In a decision that limits the parody defense in trademark infringement and right of publicity cases, the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals enjoined a Texas restaurant from calling itself “The Velvet Elvis.” The decision reversed the lower court, which held that “Velvet Elvis” did not infringe trademarks held by the Presley estate. Mark Lee […]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content