Review: ‘Leon: Version Integrale’

This 132-minute director's cut of 1994 Gallic smash "Leon" ("The Professional" in the U.S.), runs 26 minutes longer and is, according to Luc Besson, the more poignant and sensitive version he'd have released had he not been obliged to excise scenes that tested disastrously with L.A. preview auds.

This 132-minute director’s cut of 1994 Gallic smash “Leon” (“The Professional” in the U.S.), runs 26 minutes longer and is, according to Luc Besson, the more poignant and sensitive version he’d have released had he not been obliged to excise scenes that tested disastrously with L.A. preview auds. For viewers who buy into Besson’s fantasy version of the Big Apple, this longer version, which opened June 26 in France, reps a game attempt to make wall-to-wall implausibility ring a shade truer emotionally.

The fable of a 40-ish, emotionally stunted Italian hit man whose buried feelings are reawakened by a precocious 12-year-old American orphan now provides many new background details in its version integrale, most of which underline the mismatched couple’s non-platonic attraction and reinforce the girl’s bloody apprenticeship in the fine art of contract killing.

It’s not difficult to intuit why moviegoers in the U.S. would not look kindly upon a narrative that romanticizes consensual pedophilia between a preteen gamin and a middle-aged hit man, however protective and shy the guy may be when he’s not plugging marks or slitting throats.

The restored story — with its greater, close-to-carnal emphasis on the love of Mathilda (Natalie Portman) for Leon (Jean Reno) — now makes more emotional sense. Whether it makes more commercial sense beyond Gallic and select Euro-screens is open to debate. (The tamer version got an “R” rating in the U.S. In France, customers need only be age 12 to buy an unaccompanied ticket to the franker version.)

In a key scene that reportedly provoked catcalls and outrage at a U.S. test screening, Mathilda openly propositions Leon, suggesting that he deflower her. In a reply that adds genuine resonance to Leon’s peculiar lifestyle, he reveals the terrible ordeal that drove him to abandon his native Italy for New York at age 19, ending his confession with “So I wouldn’t be a very good lover.” Leon and Mathilda do spend one chaste night together in the same bed, entirely at the kid’s urging.

An undeniably powerful scene of blackmail via Russian roulette — “I want love or death, that’s it,” Mathilda threatens, before aiming a loaded pistol at her darling noggin — leads to extensive extra scenes of Leon guiding Mathilda through the paces of learning how to kill people. The apprenticeship has been expanded to include a series of brash hits on wary apartment dwellers in which the girl is a full co-conspirator, with an intense mission to the home of a tattooed drug dealer.

Leon’s patient tutorials will strike viewers as either entertaining or nauseating, but pic is way beyond “Bugsy Malone” in its approach to overdressed kids with weapons. Matilda also sets fire to the dead dealer’s drugs, which, along with Leon’s policy of not popping women or children, is the closest the film comes to having an editorial point of view.

Besson has not taken this opportunity to correct false moves in the initial film. Although all potential witnesses were slaughtered, a member of Gary Oldman’s seamy staff still manages to describe in flashback-caliber detail an ambush he didn’t witness.

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. dave says:

    “Besson has not taken this opportunity to correct false moves in the initial film. Although all potential witnesses were slaughtered, a member of Gary Oldman’s seamy staff still manages to describe in flashback-caliber detail an ambush he didn’t witness.”

    i’m not so sure about this, just seen the movie. Did we see all of the potential witnesses killed? Plotwise this hit is distinct because Léon refuses to take Mathilda because this job is “too heavy”, despite having been working with her on numerous hits to this point, including the “ring trick” hit, which was preeety heavy.

    Also, how would this have been a commissioned hit? Tony is the only person we see commissioning any hits, and the relationship seems exclusive, Tony had taken Léon under his wing when Léon first comes into the US. Tony had done work for Stansfleld (mentioned when Stansfield calls on Tony to find out where Léon is).

    The cop, buying drugs, is the target of the hit; this is demonstrated by the report of Léon saying “no women or children” (reported to Stansfield by the dreadlock-hair cop in the DEA toilets). Léon had seen this cop through his keyhole in the original slaughter at Mathilda’s family’s apartment, thus knew that the cop had been involved in killing women and a child.

    So maybe Léon did make it personal, took Mathilda’s commission after all; left some witnesses. I do remember that Léon kills a couple of bodyguards on the way in, but i’m not sure he killed all the drug sellers after the cop.

More Film News from Variety

Loading