Pay-Per-View For The Masses, Says Warner Bros. In Big MSO Pitch

Warner Bros, has launched a new campaign to persuade more cable subscribers to buy films on pay-per-view.

Ed Bleier, president of pay-tv, animation and network features at Warner Bros., last week outlined the pitch he’s delivered to most of the large multisystem owners based on a study of the 11 cable systems that rack up the biggest bucks from p-p-v.

The most important common denominator among these 11 systems is that they’re “devoting as many as four channels to p-p-v, so movie offerings can be made available more frequently and more conveniently,” Bleier said at his press conference here. The Warners’ study parallels national buy-rate estimates that show two-channel systems doing twice as well as those with one p-p-v channel and three-channel ones doing almost three times as well.

Bleier said that his research dug up other factors common to successful systems, among them:

* The best scheduling is the simplest. One or more “continuous hits” channels would run the same big-grossing film 24 hours a day for at least one full week.

* The ideal system hires at least one full-time executive to do nothing but focus on p-p-v.

* The viewer needs to be able to order a film easily, preferably by just punching up a number on his phone. When the cable system forces the viewer to remember personal-access codes and multi-digit movie numbers, it’s inviting him to bypass p-p-v and rent newer theatricals from the local video store.

* A 24-hour barker channel should be constantly promoting p-p-v films and events. And the cable system should schedule lots of 30-second spots for p-p-v in the local adjacencies it gets from all of the basic-cable networks.

* The two biggest p-p-v networks – Viewer’s Choice and Request Television – “are the problem, not the solution,” according to Bleier. “They’re geared to the ideology of their owners, not to getting the best results” from their subscribers. Stand-alone systems that side step the middlemen and instead deal directly with the film companies have better buy-rates than systems tied to V.C. and Request, he said.

* Systems should offer p-p-v to all subscribers, not just those who buy at least one paycable channel, even if that strategy would result in a sizable investment in addressable (two-way) technology.

Bleier said there’s room for p-p-v growth even among the 11 systems that score the best. For example, none of the 11 systems in the study allows viewers to subscribe to a film on the spur of the moment, the so-called “tune in anytime” capability.

The most agressive of the 11 now gross a monthly subscriber fee of $4.15 for p-p-v movies and events. But Bleier said, “As much as $10 monthly per p-p-v subscriber is attainable, if systems commit to the elements necessary for p-p-v success.”

The 11 systems in the Warner study are Cablevision of Baton Rouge (La.), Monmouth Cablevision (Belmar, N.J.); Time Warner Cable (Brooklyn/Queens, N.Y.); Garden State Cable TV (Cherry Hill, N.J.); Warner Cable (Columbus, Ohio.); Riverview Cablevision (Hoboken, N J.); Comcast Cablevision (Philadelphia); Continental Cablevision (Westfield, Mass.), and the Paragon Cable systems in Minneapolis, Portland and San Antonio.

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 0

Leave a Reply

No Comments

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More TV News from Variety

Loading