Review: ‘Terms of Endearment’

Terms of Endearment
Courtesy of Paramount Pictures

Teaming of Shirley MacLaine and Jack Nicholson at their best makes “Terms of Endearment” an enormously enjoyable offering for Christmas, adding bite and sparkle when sentiment and seamlessness threatens to sink other parts of the picture.

It’s a double pleasure to see Nicholson back in just the kind of role that catapulted him to stardom, playing a devilish, boozing astronaut who lives next door to MacLaine who has overlayed her libido with too many years of stifled feelings for everyone.

As writer and director, James L. Brooks has not made too clear what “Terms” is supposed to be about and, most of the time, it seems to be about too much, setting up situations and then skipping out of them as it tries to compress 30 years of a family relationship.

Related

Best Picture Winners

Oscar Best Picture Winners: Every Academy Award Winning Movie

At the core is mother MacLaine and daughter Debra Winger, fondly at odds from the beginning over the younger’s impending marriage to likeable, but limited, Jeff Daniels. Literally, it’s just one cut to the next; then Winger is a mother and moving away from Texas to Iowa, where she becomes a mother a couple of more times, talks to MacLaine every day, carries on an affair with John Lithgow while Daniels dallies at college with Kate Charleson.

Plotwise, MacLaine and Nicholson are first introduced as she watches him come home next door drunk. Then it’s several more years before the film finds them together again as he makes a stumbling pass at her over the fence. Then it’s several more years before they’re together again and she finally agrees to go out to lunch.

If that seems disjointed, it is. But the encounters between these two–always reminiscent of Hepburn and Bogart–are so much fun, it really doesn’t make much difference. And when their romance starts to warm up, they are terrific and continue to be when it cools down and ripens into something else.

When they’re missing from the action, Brooks has even more trouble concentrating on other single aspects of the picture, finally getting trapped into an overlong, lingering involvement with the sadness that finally befalls the characters. But tears will flow, no doubt.

Forgetting structure, though, Brooks’ dialog is wonderful throughout and all the characters carry off their assignments beautifully, even down to Danny De Vito and Norman Bennett as MacLaine’s other suffering suitors.

Production designer Polly Platt and makeup artist Ben Nye, Jr. make the 30-year time stretch completely acceptable, enhanced naturally by Andrzej Bartkowiak’s camerawork. And ably at the controls of all of this, to be sure, is Brooks the director.

Early on, MacLaine tells Winger, “You aren’t special enough to overcome a bad marriage.” But “Terms of Endearment” is certainly special enough to overcome its own problems.

Har.

Terms of Endearment

Production

A Paramount Pictures release, produced, directed and written by James L. Brooks, based on a novel by Larry McMutry. Co-producers, Penny Finkelman, Martin Jurow. Reviewed at the Bruin Theater, L.A., Nov.16, 1983.

Crew

Camera (Metrocolor), Andrzej Bartkowiak; editor, Richard Marks, sound, James Alexander; production design, Polly Platt; costumes, Kristi Zea; assistant director, Albert Shapiro; makeup, Ben Nye Jr., art direction, Harold Michelson, set design, Sandy Veneziano; music, Michael Gore. (MPAA rating: (G.) Running time: 130 MINS. Original review text from 1983.

With

Emma - Debra Winger Aurora - Shirley MacLaine Garrett - Jack Nicholson Flap - Jeff Daniels Sam - John Lithgow Teddy - Huckleberry Fox Tommy - Troy Bishop Vernon - Danny DeVito Patsy - Lisa Hart Carroll Rosie -Betty R. King Edward - Norman Bennett Janet - Kate Charleson

Filed Under:

Want to read more articles like this one? SUBSCRIBE TO VARIETY TODAY.
Post A Comment 1

Leave a Reply

1 Comment

Comments are moderated. They may be edited for clarity and reprinting in whole or in part in Variety publications.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  1. Guissepina Pescatore says:

    I don’t know what is wrong with Hollywood. I have watched movies like Terms of Endearment, who received awards and have to wonder, “What for?”

    My husband and I painfully watched the first hour hoping the movie would improve. We didn’t even watch the last 45 minutes because it was that bad.

    In a nutshell, it’s about people and their sexuality. Whoever wrote this attempted to hide the real theme, by saying it was about a mother and daughter.

    Glad I didn’t pay to watch it when it first came out. If this earned an Academy Award, I hate to think what the other movies that year were like.

    Don’t waste your time.

More Film News from Variety

Loading