You will be redirected back to your article in seconds

Jane Eyre

Charlotte Bronte's tearjerker is put over stolidly and fails to touch and move the emotions as fluently as the 1943 version with Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles.

Cast:
George C. Scott Susannah York Ian Bannen Jack Hawkins Nyree Dawn Porter Rachel Kempson

Charlotte Bronte’s tearjerker is put over stolidly and fails to touch and move the emotions as fluently as the 1943 version with Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles.

Delbert Mann’s direction and Jack Pulman’s screenplay both tend to play up incident rather than characters underlining that, despite its fame, Bronte’s story is pretty much a novelletish theme.

Casting is by no means right. George C. Scott as Rochester tends to play the role rather like Patton on a well-deserved leave, and fails to bring out the smouldering romanticism, mixed with tyranny and selfishness, which characterized Rochester, though his first scene with Jane has a sharp, sardonic tang. Since Jane Eyre is constantly described as plain, and as Susannah York who plays the heroine, patently isn’t plain, credibility is strained. York gives a pleasant but not wholly convincing portrayal.

Jane Eyre

UK

Production: Omnibus/Sagittarius. Director Delbert Mann; Producer Frederick Brogger; Screenplay Jack Pulman; Camera Paul Beeson; Editor Peter Boita; Music John Williams; Art Director Alex Vetchinsky

Crew: (Color) Available on VHS. Extract of a review from 1971. Running time: 110 MIN.

With: George C. Scott Susannah York Ian Bannen Jack Hawkins Nyree Dawn Porter Rachel Kempson

More Film

  • Ava DuVernay Central Park Five

    African American Film Critics Assn. Proclaims 2017 'Year of the Woman'

    Charlotte Bronte’s tearjerker is put over stolidly and fails to touch and move the emotions as fluently as the 1943 version with Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles. Delbert Mann’s direction and Jack Pulman’s screenplay both tend to play up incident rather than characters underlining that, despite its fame, Bronte’s story is pretty much a novelletish […]

  • ‘Working Above The Line’ panel, The

    Academy's Third Annual Careers in Film Summit Inspires Young Creatives

    Charlotte Bronte’s tearjerker is put over stolidly and fails to touch and move the emotions as fluently as the 1943 version with Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles. Delbert Mann’s direction and Jack Pulman’s screenplay both tend to play up incident rather than characters underlining that, despite its fame, Bronte’s story is pretty much a novelletish […]

  • Selma Blair

    Selma Blair's Production Company to Adapt Novel 'The Lost' Into Movie (EXCLUSIVE)

    Charlotte Bronte’s tearjerker is put over stolidly and fails to touch and move the emotions as fluently as the 1943 version with Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles. Delbert Mann’s direction and Jack Pulman’s screenplay both tend to play up incident rather than characters underlining that, despite its fame, Bronte’s story is pretty much a novelletish […]

  • Christopher Nolan Dunkirk

    Film News Roundup: Christopher Nolan to Discuss Film Preservation at Library of Congress

    Charlotte Bronte’s tearjerker is put over stolidly and fails to touch and move the emotions as fluently as the 1943 version with Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles. Delbert Mann’s direction and Jack Pulman’s screenplay both tend to play up incident rather than characters underlining that, despite its fame, Bronte’s story is pretty much a novelletish […]

  • Busan: Helmer Farooki Sets December Shoot

    Busan: Helmer Farooki Sets December Shoot for 'Saturday Afternoon'

    Charlotte Bronte’s tearjerker is put over stolidly and fails to touch and move the emotions as fluently as the 1943 version with Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles. Delbert Mann’s direction and Jack Pulman’s screenplay both tend to play up incident rather than characters underlining that, despite its fame, Bronte’s story is pretty much a novelletish […]

  • Director Nonzee Niminbutr Blends History With

    Cult Thai Director Blends History With Whodunnit in ‘Francis Chit’

    Charlotte Bronte’s tearjerker is put over stolidly and fails to touch and move the emotions as fluently as the 1943 version with Joan Fontaine and Orson Welles. Delbert Mann’s direction and Jack Pulman’s screenplay both tend to play up incident rather than characters underlining that, despite its fame, Bronte’s story is pretty much a novelletish […]

More From Our Brands

Access exclusive content